This passage of Scripture is in keeping with the verse that we have called to be the theme for this Gospel, “But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name” (20:31). This whole narrative/chapter is meant to show specifically the Deity of Jesus Christ.
Healing the Lame (5:1-9a)
Verse 1. There is no indication as to which feast that is being celebrated here in this passage. We do know that according to Old Testament law, there were three feasts that occurred every year that required the males to be present at the temple. These feasts were the Feast of Unleavened Bread/Passover, Feast of Weeks and the Feast of Tabernacles/Booths (Deut. 16:16). Therefore, Jesus must have visited Jerusalem more times than are accounted for in the Gospels. Most speculate this was feast was to celebrate the Passover but there is no indication of such here in the text. We only know that this was the reason as to why Jesus was in Jerusalem.
Verse 2. John explains that there is a man made body of water near the sheep gate in Jerusalem. The word “market” in the KJV translation is listed in italics because it was supplied by the translators. The word “market” is not in the Greek text. Other translators have supplied the word “gate” instead of “market” and I would have to agree that it is a better fit. There is a sheep gate that is mentioned in Nehemiah 3:1. So we know one would have existed.
The fact that the pool has five porches allowed archaeologists in the 1890’s be able to identify its location to the northeast just outside the city. The Bethesda pool was actually two pools beside each other. There was a porch on each of the four sides and one porch between the two pools. This would explain why there were five porches instead of four.
Verse 3a. The pool of Bethesda was a common place for the sick, lame, blind and withered to gather. One of the reasons for this was because it was outside of the city. The other reason was because of a belief that one could be healed when the water was stirred up (cf. v. 7).
Verse 3b-4. Starting from the word, “waiting,” to the end of verse 4 is a section that is missing in all manuscripts of John that were written before 400 A.D. This would give a better explanation as to why this section seems so peculiar. Some men would sometimes put a note beside the text when they were making copies of Scripture by hand. This could be one of the slim examples of when the note from a previous scribe was not differentiated from the rest of the text and was inserted into the body of the text. Some will argue the point of wether or not this verse should be in here but the evidence of it lacking in older manuscripts speaks very loudly that it should not. A good translation of the Bible will have a notation in the margin concerning this. For those who are concerned/confused, I assure you, we have not lost any Scripture. We have only gained a man’s note. God’s Word has not been ruined. His Word has still been preserved.
I therefore doubt that an angel was truly coming down to stir up the waters. The angel was merely a man’s note of what might have been a superstitious explanation for why the withered, sick, lame and blind gathered there. However, for whatever reason (possibly because of a spring), the water would occasionally be stirred up and the first man to step into the water would receive some healing from the water. Also, “Some ancient witnesses indicate that the waters of the pool were red with minerals, and thus thought to have medicinal value.” It would be doubtful that the healing was permanent which should be contrasted with Jesus described the healing as something that was final and permanent.
Verses 5-6. Jesus passes by the pool of Bethesda on the way into the city of Jerusalem and notice one man that was lying beside the water waiting for it to be stirred. The man must have been lame. He was in this condition for thirty eight years – a long time to have to deal with an infirmity. It does not say though that he was born in this condition, or how old the man is, only the length of time that this man has suffered.
From the text, it would appear that Jesus only healed this one man. However, it does not say that He healed only this man. John may have only written about this man because he caused a heap of trouble later on.
Jesus asked the man if he would like to be made whole or to be healed of his lameness. This may seem silly but some men do not want help. After 38 years the man have wanted to stay in the condition he was in because he had grown accustomed to it.
Verse 7. The lame man did not recognize Jesus as man who is capable to heal a person. The lame man instead made an explanation that he has never been the first one to step into the water after it was stirred. Simply it is too hard for a lame man to beat the able bodied people to the pool. His answer to Jesus’ question then would be “Yes, can you help get to the pool before the others.”
This is a good example to show that faith of the recipient was not a necessary requirement for a miracle to be performed. This lame man had no idea that Jesus was capable of healing him. He wanted to be healed from infirmity but he was not expecting healing from Jesus.
Verses 8-9a. Jesus then commands the lame man to do three things that would have been impossible for him to do. He needs to get up. He needs to pick up his bed/pallet. He needs to walk. Impossible things for a lame man of 38 years.
Yet, John stresses that immediately the man was made whole. He was instantaneously healed. This was man that laid down for 38 years unable to move, but there was no waiting period for his legs to start working again. The lame did not watch his legs become whole again. He was able to stand immediately. He was able to take up his bed immediately. He was able to walk immediately. This is truly a miracle that was done by the word of Jesus upon a man that did not know who Jesus even is.
This miracle is what most commentators refer to as the third sign. The first sign was turning the water into wine. The second sign was the healing of the noble man’s son from a distance. More light can be shed on this by looking at Isaiah 35:4-6.
Say to them that are of a fearful heart, Be strong, fear not: Behold, your God will come with vengeance, Even God with a recompence; He will come and save you. Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened, And the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped. Then shall the lame man leap as an hart, And the tongue of the dumb sing: For in the wilderness shall waters break out, And streams in the desert.
John the Baptist began to wonder if Jesus was the Christ and Jesus answered by quoting this passage from Isaiah (Matt. 11:2-5). In Isaiah, it is God that is healing the people. Jesus is healing people because He is God. He is making the deaf hear. He is making the dumb to sing. Later, we will see that He makes the blind see. And in this passage, Jesus made the lame walk.
Work on the Sabbath (5:9b-16)
Verse 9b. The verse division is a little poor here. “And the same day was the sabbath,” really deserves to be it’s own verse. This sets up the stage for what is about to happen.
In order to understand why this is significant, one must understand how important the sabbath day is for the Jew, especially the pharisees. This comes form the fourth commandment.
Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it (Exod. 20:8-11).
As mentioned, the commandment is modeled after the creation week. God did not create anything more on the seventh day. This commandment is mentioned several more times in the Old Testament (Jer. 17:21, 27; Neh. 13:15-21). The sabbath was meant to be a sign of the covenant between the people of Israel and God. Disobedience to the sabbath law could result in a death penalty (Exod. 31:12-14).
The problem comes when one tries to decide what constitutes as work. There are some clear examples in the commands but sometimes it was unclear if one could do such a thing on the sabbath day. The Pharisees, then, decided to constitute what is and is not a violation of the sabbath law. Yet, they always were on the safe side. They create rules to be sure not to break the commandments. However, sometimes these rules got to be a bigger deal than the commandments themselves. Christians who enforce the wearing of skirts for girls is a good example of this. Some of the rules concerning the sabbath were ridiculous. For example, according to the Mishnah, a person was allowed to borrow material goods from his neighbor but he was not allowed to say, “Lend them to me,” because this would incur a transaction, which is work. Another example is that a man was not allowed to untie a knot because it constituted as work. The part that was to get this formerly lame man in trouble was that the pharisees said that it was work to carry something from a public place to a private place. The Old Testament law did not state this, but the pharisees elevated their rules to the same level as the law.
Verse 10. The Jews were quick to notice the man was carrying his bed. This was a violation, in their mind, of the sabbath law. He was doing work.
Verse 11. The formerly lame man quickly tries to divert attention away from himself by telling them that the person who healed him told him to carry his bed. The formerly lame man was worried about the consequences that could fall upon him if were not able to get out of condemnation of the Jewish authorities. There was a possibility of being stoned to death.
Verse 12. The Jews missed something inquiring the formerly lame man missed something. They missed that are talking to a formerly lame man. They were more concerned about someone breaking their rules, as opposed to God’s commandments, concerning the sabbath. This goes to show how obsessed they were about their own rules. Never mind the fact that a man that was lame for 38 years is now able to walk and carry his bed. Somebody told him to break the sabbath law. They wanted to find Jesus not because He healed a man, but because He was breaking man’s rules about the sabbath.
Verse 13. The man that was healed did know who Jesus was. It states that Jesus had conveyed Himself away because of the multitude there. Jesus did not want to draw attention to Himself. The people in Jerusalem followed Him around because of the signs He performed last time He was there (2:23; cf. Mark 1:44-45; 3:12). Jesus was not there for attention or crowds. This must have prevented Jesus from having a conversation with the man so Jesus did not get the opportunity to explain Himself.
Verse 14. Remember, there is a feast that is going on that day. That was the whole reason why Jesus came down to Jerusalem in the first place. Therefore it should be no surprise that Jesus was at the temple. It could also be that the majority of the town was at the temple for the feast.
There is inference here that this man fell into the condition that he was in due to some sin that he was in. This is not always the case (9:2-3). We are not able to tell if a man’s poor state is due to his own sin or not. However, God does circumstances to teach us in order to conform to the image of Christ (Rom. 8:28-29). Also, ultimately, every disease, misfortune and death is due to the fact that sin came into the world (Rom 5:12).
Verse 15. For whatever reason, the man decided to inform his inquisitors that it was Jesus that healed Him. Perhaps the Jews were still pestering him. Perhaps he was trying to avert the attention and anger of the Jews to someone else. It seems more like ratting someone out to me. It is probably for this reason that Jesus told to sin no more. Jesus knew the man to be a hard man. The best thing for the man would have been to go home and shut himself inside so he would not have to deal with the Jews again. Instead, it seems, he rats Jesus out. We never do see the man be thankful for being healed from his infirmity.
Verse 16. Again, the Jews/Pharisees miss the point. They seek Jesus out because they want to slay Him for breaking the sabbath. This goes just how much anger the Jews must have had toward the man that was healed for carrying his bed. The Jews forget the fact that Jesus healed a man. For some reason, they do not care about a man being healed. A man breaks the rules every day. But it is not every day that a lame man is healed.
This is the first time mentioned in this gospel that the Jews want Jesus dead. There are 21 chapters in the Gospel of John and they already want Jesus dead. They want Him dead for breaking man’s rules.
My Father Works, So Do I (5:17-18)
Verses 17-18. Jesus’ response was that because His Father is working, He can also work on the sabbath. Jesus did not argue with them as to wether or not their rules were right in condemning the man for working on the sabbath. He dropped a bombshell on them instead. He called Himself equal with God. Jesus is equal to God, because Jesus is God.
There was an argument about wether or not God observed the sabbath day. A lot of men stated, “No, God must work on the sabbath otherwise we would cease to exist.” God did not only create the universe but He also continuously sustains the universe. He is continually working in creation to make things occur according to how we naturally expect nature to work. He put things in order and He keeps them in order. Jesus was saying because God is always working in sustaining creation, I also am allowed to work because I am God. “And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath” (Mark 2:27).
The Jews understood Jesus as calling Himself equal with God. Although perhaps they did not understand at that moment that Jesus and the Father are the same God. Therefore the Jew would have considered Jesus’ words blasphemy. They did not however, take the time to find if His words were true. They should have known that the Messiah, Jesus would be God in flesh. “Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, And shall call his name Immanuel” (Isa. 7:14). Immanuel means God with us.
But the Jews only want to kill Jesus all the more. Which is why it says, “After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for He would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill Him.”
No comments:
Post a Comment